Fait un iperf3 -s sur la box et laisse tourner (ça lance un serveur iperf sur ta box en mode serveur, avec le port par défaut), puis un iperf3.exe -R -c <ip LAN de la box> sur le PC client windows. Iperf permet de faire serveur aussi.
j'ai un message d'erreur :
root@box:~# iperf3 -s
iperf3: error - unable to start listener for connections: Address in use
iperf3: exiting
haa il faut indiquer un port ! iperf3 -s -p 9999
C:\iperf3>iperf3.exe -R -c 192.168.1.1 -p 9999
Connecting to host 192.168.1.1, port 9999
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.1.1 is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.10 port 24703 connected to 192.168.1.1 port 9999
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 89.5 MBytes 751 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 87.5 MBytes 734 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 943 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 106 MBytes 890 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 110 MBytes 922 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 117 MBytes 978 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 102 MBytes 858 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 121 MBytes 1.01 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 99.2 MBytes 832 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 110 MBytes 926 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.03 GBytes 888 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.03 GBytes 885 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
J'ai ma femme qui regarde la TV en 1080p à coté
donc je ne suis pas seul a consommer du débit.
Mais si je fais le meme test que sur bouygues.testdebit.info en UDP
C:\iperf3>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.1.1 -p 9999 -u -R -b 900M
Connecting to host 192.168.1.1, port 9999
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.1.1 is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.10 port 60481 connected to 192.168.1.1 port 9999
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 72.6 MBytes 609 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 9122/61293 (15%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 72.1 MBytes 605 Mbits/sec 0.004 ms 9484/61292 (15%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 72.3 MBytes 607 Mbits/sec 0.007 ms 9324/61277 (15%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 72.7 MBytes 610 Mbits/sec 0.003 ms 9102/61326 (15%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 72.2 MBytes 605 Mbits/sec 0.012 ms 9479/61299 (15%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 72.2 MBytes 606 Mbits/sec 0.006 ms 9481/61335 (15%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 73.3 MBytes 615 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 8660/61320 (14%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 72.9 MBytes 611 Mbits/sec 0.012 ms 8951/61305 (15%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 72.3 MBytes 606 Mbits/sec 0.005 ms 9367/61271 (15%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 76.4 MBytes 641 Mbits/sec 0.008 ms 6432/61328 (10%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 854 MBytes 716 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/613089 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 729 MBytes 612 Mbits/sec 0.008 ms 89402/613046 (15%) receiver
iperf Done.
et j'ai fait le contraire, iperf3 en serveur sur le PC et en client sur la box :
root@box:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.1.10 -p 9999 -u -R -b 900M
Connecting to host 192.168.1.10, port 9999
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.1.10 is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.1.1 port 37363 connected to 192.168.1.10 port 9999
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 74.1 MBytes 621 Mbits/sec 0.018 ms 0/53193 (0%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 73.2 MBytes 614 Mbits/sec 0.018 ms 0/52576 (0%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 74.3 MBytes 623 Mbits/sec 0.021 ms 212/53546 (0.4%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 74.1 MBytes 622 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 288/53537 (0.54%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 74.1 MBytes 622 Mbits/sec 0.015 ms 0/53228 (0%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 73.0 MBytes 612 Mbits/sec 0.029 ms 0/52406 (0%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 75.3 MBytes 632 Mbits/sec 0.016 ms 0/54066 (0%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 77.8 MBytes 653 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 0/55872 (0%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 78.3 MBytes 657 Mbits/sec 0.017 ms 0/56217 (0%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 77.3 MBytes 649 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 16/55567 (0.029%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 752 MBytes 631 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/540225 (0%) sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 751 MBytes 630 Mbits/sec 0.025 ms 516/540208 (0.096%) receiver
iperf Done.
Ha la par contre je suis a moins de 1%, ce serait pas la version windows de iperf3 qui chie dans la colle ? d'ailleurs les 2 personnes qui semblent avoir un lost super bas sont sous linux.